Home |  Back |  Background |  Progress |  Presentations |  Availability |  Wind Tunnel |  Aircraft |  Motor Vehicle |  Email Group |  Contact  |  Currency |  Cart

Sinha Deturbulator Progress Reports

Progress Articles
6/21/2003 Drag measurement instrumentation
9/17/2003 First successful test of Sinha deturbulator on a glider
10/18/2003 Further drag reductions on Standard Cirrus wing
  A comparison to turbulators
  Baseline polar for performance testing
2/8/2004 Progress Report: SSA Convention in Atlanta
2/28/2004 First outer-span test
5/27/2004 Wind tunnel goes into operation
8/31/2004 Stereolithography used for wind tunnel wing sections
12/3/2004 First success on upper surface of Standard Cirrus wing
12/12/2004 More success on upper surface of Standard Cirrus wing
2/18/2005 First Sink-Rate Measurement
(revised 3/13/2005)
2/26/2005 Second Sink-Rate Measurement: Some Encouraging Data
3/19/2005 First Parallel Flight: More Encouraging Data
3/19/2005 Measurements with Full Top Surface Deturbulation
9/12/2005 A Performance Endurance Issue
10/29/2005 It’s Deturbulation Time Again
1/9/2006 Paper Presented at AAIA Annual Conference
2/3/2006 Talk Presented at SSA Annual Convention
5/6/2006 Paper Presented at AAIA Flow Control Conference
7/1/2006 Notes on Endurance and the Temperature/Humidity Issue
10/21/2006 Measurements Show 20% Improvement!
(revised 1/3/07)
12/13/2006 Deturbulator Performance Confirmed!
1/2/2007 Calibrated Airspeeds
12/13/2006 Summary of Johnson Flight Test
(revised 2/10/2007)
12/13/2006 Details of Johnson Flight Test
(revised 12/26/2007)
12/01/2007 Johnson Effect Confirmed
(revised 12/26/2007)

Publications and Presentations
1/9/2006 Sailplane Performance Improvement Using a Flexible Composite Surface Deturbulator - Sinha
(PDF, 1174 KB)
6/5/2006 Drag Reduction of Natural Laminar Flow Airfoils with a Flexible Surface Deturbulator - Sinha
(PDF, 757 KB)
2/10/2007 Wing Surface Deturbulators - Johnson
(PowerPoint, 2140 KB)
2/10/2007 Revolutionary Aerodynamics - Sinha
(PDF, 856 KB)
2/10/2007 Two Years on Deturbulated Wings - Hendrix
(PowerPoint, 395 KB)
6/26/2007 Optimizing Wing Lift to Drag Ratio Enhancement with Flexible-Wall Turbulence Control - Sinha
(PDF, 588 KB)
8/6/2007 Improving Automotive Fuel Efficiency with Deturbulator Tape - Sinha
(PDF, 1368 KB)
2/14/2008 Extreme Performance - Hendrix
(PowerPoint, 1.4 MB)


A comparison to turbulators

Figure 14. Drag change comparison: FCS on Std. Cirrus
vs Turbulators on ASW-24
A common question is "how will the Sinha Deturbulator perform compared to turbulators?" For a proper answer, this should be studied on a given aircraft with the same instrumentation. But we haven't gotten around to that yet. Also, there are a lot of different gliders out there and, obviously, data from Std. Cirrus tests cannot be used to infer what Sinha FCS will do for another ship. Nevertheless, to put a comparison out there, I went back to Dick Johnson's evaluation of the ASW-24W (
Soaring, May 1994) where the effect of the factory turbulators was dramatic.

Fig. 14 plots the drag measurements of both ships in kts. It also shows percent change in both cases. The green curve is the Std. Cirrus clean wing. The red curve is the Std. Cirrus wing modified with Sinha FCS. The broken red curve is the percent change for the Std. Cirrus wing, plotted against the right side scale. The blue curve is the ASW-24W clean wing. The brown curve is the ASW-24W wing with factory turbulator tape. The broken brown curve is the percent change for the ASW-24W wing, plotted against the right side scale.

Note that the data are in units of airspeed here because that's the way the they were reported by Johnson. Therefore, the percent improvement for the FCS is less than that calculated in Volts.

Since different drag rakes were used at different span stations on different wings, the drag data should not be compared directly between the two ships. A more meaningful comparison is the relative drag changes for the two cases (broken lines).

I leave it to the readers to draw their own conclusions.

Jim Hendrix
Oxford Aero Equipment



Airspeeds shown in graphs are instrument calibrated. The aircraft airspeed system is not calibrated. Errors in the Standard Cirrus static/Pitot system bias the data towards higher speeds. This makes polars seem better than they really are. However, this is not an issue when the purpose is only to show comparitive data on the same glider.


Home
Contact

© Copyright 2003-2007 Jim Hendrix